Wednesday, March 6, 2019

“Bold Girls” by Rona Munro Essay

In her dramatic reckon Bold Girls, Rona rice beer has created a relevant and inspiring legacy of war-torn Northern Ireland. Her drama depicts the fooling struggles and predicaments grimaced by four particular women, who seem to thrive on their fantasies and illusions entirely except Deirdre who is marked aside as different from the dramas beginningDeirdre is not in this room, shes crouching on all fours on her own talkingout of darkness in which single her face is visible.Introduced as a surreal and somewhat eerie reputation it is no surprise that Deirdre contrasts greatly with the terce other women. It is her persistent see for the equity that polarises her from the others and ca enforces her to be at odds with them as they shut out rectitude and cushion themselves with their idealistic dreams. This idea of fantasy versus naturalism is a main concern at bottom the play, and it is through monologues and stage direction that we argon allowed a deeper understanding of eac h char twisters situation and of the plays themes.A particular monologue of Deirdres undoubtedly confirms that her look for for truth will result in the hurt of others and possible confrontations and idle encountersThe lights changeI need a knife a piddle stigma of my ownIt was the knife he was talkingabout. It was the truth. I design Id corresponding that. A wee bit of potent truthyou could hold in your hand and turn on where you liked.The lights changeI believe this monologue verifies Deirdres role as catalyst. By this point we have been introduced to all four women and to their dreams and fantasies, which Deirdres wee weather vane of truth threatens to destroy. Deirdres yearning for the truth ca economic consumptions her to kill these dreams, bringing the tierce idealistic women crashing back to the harsh reality that surrounds them. Deirdres conflict is sterling(prenominal) with the central character, Marie. Comp atomic number 18d with huisache and Noras corporeal istic dreams of redecorating her living room (Nora) and leave Belfast (Cassie), Maries delusions of her late husbands heroic acts and believability are not as empty as her friends.These dreams are instilled within objects in the womens homes for example Noras dream is symbolised by a whistle polyester mix, Cassies by a wad of silver hidden behind Michels photograph and Maries by a grainy blow up of her late husband, Michael. As the play progresses it becomes unmixed that Deirdre is intent on destroying each characters dream, but I think it is also suggested that she is somewhat linked with Marie and her dream. Munro again get aheads social occasion of symbolism to connect these cardinal characters. For example, Deirdres mini dress is mindful of Maries wedding dressThen other times she looks like meyou remember that dress I wasmarried in, that wee white mini-dress?She stands. And stares.I believe it is as though Munro is depicting Deirdre as a ghost of Maries past. This becom es relevant later in the play when Deirdre reveals to Marie that she is in fact Michaels daughter.The simple observation of Deirdre standing alone at the bottom of the path reflects how she appears isolated from the others in her search for truth she longsighteds to campaign the truth and become part of the family unit maintained by the three other womenIm wet, Im cold. I expect to get insideI want to get inside. Cantkeep me out.This monologue has quite a threatening undertone , it is as though Deirdres isolation causes her distress. I believe also that the use of wet and cold highlight the harsh environment and the fact that Deirdre is unloved. I think all of these factors isolation and the longing for truth cause Deirdre to act as catalyst. In taking on this role, Deirdre threatens to destroy the fellow womens dreams. Her first act as catalyst is when she steals Cassies notes hence ruining her dream of escape and freedom. Deirdre makes obvious to the reader that Cassies but toned-down dream is wrong and unobtainable in a short, eerie monologueThe whole towns a prison, thrill chunks off the wall causewere all in a prison.Cassies dream of escape is obviously unrealistic and false and I believe Deidres destruction of the dream validates this idea.Deirdre also appears to be in conflict with Nora, Cassies mother, a she goes on to use her wee blade of truth to shed Noras shiny strike polyester fabric and ultimately her dreamDeirdrelooks at the broad, smooth stretch of material then startsto slash at it, ripping it, trampling it till shes breathless.Deirdres violent reactions I believe show what harsh and offensive situations she has been exposed to. She desires to know the truth so much, that she finds happiness in destroying the illusions and fantasies of others, forcing them to face their reality and embrace the truth.Although Cassie and Nora do avoid the truth that their materialistic hopes will always elude them, it is Maries complete glossing over o f the truth that causes her to be most at odds with Deirdre. Her lullaby that she uses to calm her son for example, shows how dependant she is on her delusions about MichaelYour daddy was a good man and a brave manthats whatkeeps us all together, keeps me going, keeps me unwaveringMarie finds comfort in her deluded memories of Michael. I believe this blanking of the truth angers Deirdre and causes her to react violently and destructively toward Marie and her dreamsDeirdre hurls the clothes at her. She snatches the knife outof the chair and waves the blade at Marie. She advances onher slowly.I want the truth out of you. I mean it.This I believe is symbolic in showing that Deirdre uses the truth as a harmful device and that Marie is threatened by its probable exposure. Maries reaction is shocking and uncharacteristic of her gentle, nurturing nature she takes Michaels fork over and using Deirdres knife, destroys it. Marie in turn destroys Deirdres dream of subtile the truth about her father.These two characters, who are at the greatest point in their conflict portray through their actions the main concerns of the text reality versus illusion reality conquers over dreams and pointless fantasies. The unveiling of the truth brings these two closer together allowing them to reconcile. The conclusion of the play suggests hope and optimism for the recovery of these women. They apportion in a special, ritual feeding of the birds, their relationship to emulate that of a mother and daughterDid you ever feed the birds, Deirdre?NoI like the common wee birdsyoud need to be something specialto strain a nest around the Falls. Someone should feed them. Deirdre and Maries conflict is resolved by Maries embracing of the truth that she has for so long avoided. The central idea of Bold Girls of reality versus dreams is made obvious by the characters actions, they cope by padding their harsh reality and cushioning themselves with fantasies and illusions. These qualities ar e instilled within the characters of the play, Marie, Cassie and Nora thrive on fantasies and dreams whereas Deirdre lives for the truth.The opposing forces I flavor cause the characters to be in conflict with each other. Their compromising situations and incompatible ideas about reality create friction between the opposing characters of Deirdre and Marie. Munro expertly uses stage direction, soliloquy and the opposing forces of truth and fantasy to make apparent the concerns of the text and to heighten my personal appreciation of their importance in these womens lives.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.